4.6 Article

Efficient Solvent Selection Approach for High Solubility of Active Phytochemicals: Application for the Extraction of an Antimalarial Compound from Medicinal Plants

Journal

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages 4332-4339

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00384

Keywords

Solubility; Artemisinin; Extraction; Green solvent; Process development; Active compound

Funding

  1. Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research in Algeria (MESRS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The proposed approach unveils an efficient solvent selection manner for the extraction of active compounds from medicinal plants based on their high solvency for the target compound while considering green engineering principles. Rationalization of resources is achieved through theoretical screening using the Hansen solubility parameters in practice (HSPiP) approach of 26 solvent candidates toward the solvency of the antimalarial drug artemisinin. Solvent selection is challenged to meet some green engineering principles, from which four solvents are identified and then confirmed using gravimetric tests. The highest solubility at 20 degrees C is attributed to dimethyl sulfoxide with 103.7 mg.mL(-1), while isopropanol recorded 8.45 mg.mL(-1). Despite being a polar solvent, propylene glycol gave a very low solubility of 0.6 mg.mL(-1). Being a food grade with very low global warming potential score, isopropanol stands as a green alternative to substitute n-hexane, where solubility measurements using changes of turbidity measurement indicate good solvency for artemisinin with 39.92 mg.mL(-1) at 40 degrees C, a temperature at which generally extraction is conducted. Application of isopropanol to artemisinin extraction from Artemesia annua L. indicates a good artemisinin yield of 65% in only a single batch sequence at which the recovered crystals have a purity of more than 67%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available