4.7 Article

Influence of SAP content and curing age on air void distribution of high performance concrete using 3D volume analysis

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 135, Issue -, Pages 580-589

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.128

Keywords

Computed tomography (CT) scanning; 3D-void analysis; High-performance concrete; Air void distribution; Superabsorbent Polymers (SAP); SAP content; Binder type; Curing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Incorporating Superabsorbents Polymers (SAP) as internal curing agents (IC-agents) in high performance concrete (HPC) for mitigation of autogenous shrinkage is one new trend in concrete practice. SAP's water absorption and desorption as cement hydrates however leaves micro voids within the concrete which can negatively influence the mechanical properties of HPC. The SAP content, sizes, binder composition, solid constituents of concrete and curing age could be of direct influence on the resultant air voids sizes and its distribution in concrete. This paper therefore reports on three dimensional (3D) volume analysis of the influence of SAP contents and curing age on air voids distribution in HPC. Four HPC mixtures with different binder constituents and water/binder (W/13): M-1F and M-1s (0.2), M-2 (0.25) and M-3 (0.3) were tested with two grain sizes of SAP (SP1 <= 300 m and SP2 <= 600 mu m). The SAP contents were also varied (0%; 0.2%; 0.3%; and 0.4%) by weight of binder. Concrete cylinders (50 mm theta x 100 mm) were cast and cured in water for different ages (7, 28, 56 and 90 days) before the hardened HPC was subjected to X-ray computed tomography (CT) scanning for determination of the air void distribution. The analysed 3D X-ray images gave results on SAP grain sizes, SAP air voids, distribution and volume in the HPC with the respective influence of binder type, W/13 and curing age assessed. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available