4.7 Article

The role of coacervation and phase transitions in the sandcastle worm adhesive system

Journal

ADVANCES IN COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 239, Issue -, Pages 88-96

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2016.06.008

Keywords

Bioadhesive; Complex coacervation; Condensed polyelectrolytes; Sandcastle worm; Sabellariidae; Phragmatopoma californica

Funding

  1. Office of Naval Research
  2. National Institutes of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sandcastle worms, Phragmatopoma californica (Fewkes), live along the western coast of North America. Individual worms build tubular shells under seawater by gluing together sandgrains and biomineral particles with a multipart, rapid-set, self-initiating adhesive. The glue comprises distinct sets of condensed, oppositely charged polyelectrolytic components-polyphosphates, polysulfates, and polyamines-that are separately granulated and stored at high concentration in distinct cell types. The pre-organized adhesive modules are secreted separately and intact, but rapidly fuse with minimal mixing and expand into a crack-penetrating complex fluid. Within 30 s of secretion into seawater, the fluid adhesive transitions (sets) into a porous solid adhesive joint. The nano- and microporous structure of the foamy solid adhesive contributes to the strength and toughness of the adhesive joint through several mechanisms. A curing agent (catechol oxidase), co-packaged into both types of adhesive granules, covalently cross-links the adhesive and becomes a structural component of the final adhesive joint. The overall effectiveness of the granulated sandcastle glue is more a product of the cellular sorting and packaging mechanisms, the transition from fluid to solid following secretion, and its final biphasic porous structure as it is of its composition or any particular amino acid modification. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available