4.6 Article

Development of Resilience Index Based on Flooding Damage in Urban Areas

Journal

WATER
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w9060428

Keywords

flooding damage; resilience index; multi-dimensional flood damage analysis

Funding

  1. Advanced Water Management Research Program - Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport of the Korean government [13AWMP-B066744-01]
  2. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea
  3. Korean government (MSIP) [2016R1A2A1A05005306]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016R1A2A1A05005306] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flooding volume in urban areas is not linearly proportional to flooding damage because, in some areas, no flooding damage occurs until the flooding depth reaches a certain point, whereas flooding damage occurs in other areas whenever flooding occurs. Flooding damage is different from flooding volume because each subarea has different components. A resilience index for urban drainage systems was developed based on flooding damage. In this study, the resilience index based on flooding damage in urban areas was applied to the Sintaein basin in Jeongup, Korea. The target watershed was divided into five subareas according to the status of land use in each subarea. The damage functions between flooding volume and flooding damage were calculated by multi-dimensional flood damage analysis. The extent of flooding damage per minute was determined from the results of flooding volume per minute using damage functions. The values of the resilience index based on flooding damages were distributed from 0.797292 to 0.933741. The resilience index based on flooding damage suggested in this study can reflect changes in urban areas and can be used for the evaluation of flood control plans such as the installation, replacement, and rehabilitation of drainage facilities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available