4.7 Article

Incorporation of implicit decision-maker preferences in multi-objective evolutionary optimization using a multi-criteria classification method

Journal

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
Volume 50, Issue -, Pages 48-57

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.10.037

Keywords

Evolutionary algorithms; Multi-objective optimization; Implicit preferences; Multi-criteria sorting

Funding

  1. PRODEP
  2. Autonomous University of Sinaloa [PROFAPI-055/2012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nowadays, most Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEA) concentrate mainly on searching for an approximation of the Pareto frontier to solve a multi-objective optimization problem. However, finding this set does not completely solve the problem. The decision-maker (DM) still has to choose the best compromise solution from that set. But as the number of criteria increases, several important difficulties arise in performing this task. Identifying the Region of Interest (ROI), according to the DM's preferences, is a promising alternative that would facilitate the selection process. This paper approaches the incorporation of preferences into a MOEA in order to characterize the ROI by a multi-criteria classification method. This approach is called Hybrid Multi-Criteria Sorting Genetic Algorithm and is composed of two phases. First, a metaheuristic is used to generate a small set of solutions that are classified in ordered categories by the DM. Thus, the DM's preferences will be reflected indirectly in this set. In the second phase, a multi criteria sorting method is combined with an evolutionary algorithm. The first one is used to classify new solutions. Those classified as 'satisfactory' are used for creating a selective pressure towards the ROI. The effectiveness of our method was proved in nine instances of a public project portfolio problem. The obtained results indicate that our approach achieves a good characterization of the ROI, and outperforms the standard NSGA-II in simple and complex problems. Also, these results confirm that our approach is able to deal with many-objective problems. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available