4.4 Article

Future professional food handlers' perspectives towards food safety

Journal

BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL
Volume 119, Issue 2, Pages 411-424

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/BFJ-07-2016-0335

Keywords

Food safety; Education; Qualitative research; Student; Food handler; Food hygiene

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to gain insight into various food safety aspects of future professional food handlers, representing different professions in the food supply chain (FSC), close to the end of their formal education. Design/methodology/approach - A total of 15 focus group discussions including 94 participants were conducted. A semi-structured approach was applied to discussions about the comprehension of food safety, the responsibility for food safety, the barriers hindering food safety practices, and the food safety influence of other people. Findings - Differences related to the field of study and level of education were identified. The results demonstrate the diversity of interpretations of food safety with control of biological hazards strongly emphasized. The responsibility for food safety is perceived differently by position in the FSC. Different barriers related to the working environment and personal factors were identified. Parental influence on the target population is decreased as focus is shifted to the teachers of practical classes and especially to the instructors in food enterprises. Research limitations/implications - Considering the response rate and the small number of schools offering a specific study programme not all the study fields and educational levels were equally represented. Practical implications - The findings could assist educators, policy makers, and food business operators in their efforts to develop educational programmes that will more effectively contribute to the safety of food. Originality/value - No research thus far has focussed on students being educated as future professional food handlers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available