4.7 Article

The traditional energy-growth nexus: A comparison between sustainable development and economic growth approaches

Journal

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
Volume 75, Issue -, Pages 286-296

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.048

Keywords

Sustainable development; Economic growth; PCSE; ISEW; Europe

Funding

  1. NECE-UBI Research Unit in Business Science and Economics - FCT - Portuguese Foundation for the Development of Science and Technology, Ministry of Education and Science [UID/GES/04630/2013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the indicator commonly used to measure economic growth and sustainable development. However,this indicator can be very inefficient for evaluating development. The most prominent alternative indicator is the Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW). Indeed, this index can be used to control for the way that countries use available resources, balancing ecological development, damages caused to the environment and income distribution between citizens. This paper compares a sustainable development approach, using the ISEW, with the traditional economic growth approach using GDP, and its relationship with energy consumption. The traditional hypotheses of the energy-growth nexus are tested through Panel-Corrected Standard Errors estimators, for a panel constituted by twenty European countries, with an annual data frequency for the time span 1995-2014. The results indicate a new negative feedback hypothesis for the alternative measure of development and a conservative hypothesis for economic growth with energy consumption. This study also finds various other effects on sustainable development by economic growth factors, such as Terms-of-trade and Rents from natural resources. These findings indicate that the economic growth approach, widely studied using GDP, has been wrongly interpreted by policy makers trying to achieve increased sustainable development. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available