4.4 Article

Local Adaptation Interacts with Expansion Load during Range Expansion: Maladaptation Reduces Expansion Load

Journal

AMERICAN NATURALIST
Volume 189, Issue 4, Pages 368-380

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/690673

Keywords

range expansion; expansion load; mutation load; local adaptation; surfing; genetic drift

Funding

  1. Beaty Biodiversity Research Centre
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) [RGPIN-2016-03779]
  3. NSERC
  4. Killam postdoctoral fellowship
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [P1SKP3_168393]
  6. SNSF [PP00P3 144846]
  7. Genome Canada
  8. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [P1SKP3_168393] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The biotic and abiotic factors that facilitate or hinder species range expansions are many and complex. We examine the impact of two genetic processes and their interaction on fitness at expanding range edges: local maladaptation resulting from the presence of an environmental gradient and expansion load resulting from increased genetic drift at the range edge. Results from spatially explicit simulations indicate that the presence of an environmental gradient during range expansion reduces expansion load; conversely, increasing expansion load allows only locally adapted populations to persist at the range edge. Increased maladaptation reduces the speed of range expansion, resulting in less genetic drift at the expanding front and more immigration from the range center, therefore reducing expansion load at the range edge. These results may have ramifications for species being forced to shift their ranges because of climate change or other anthropogenic changes. If rapidly changing climate leads to faster expansion as populations track their shifting climatic optima, populations may suffer increased expansion load beyond previous expectations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available