4.7 Article

High Resolution Mapping of Cropping Cycles by Fusion of Landsat and MODIS Data

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/rs9121232

Keywords

time series; data fusion; land cover mapping; multiple cropping; cropping intensity

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0604302, 2017YFA0604402]
  2. Major Project of the University-Industry-Institute Collaboration Foundation of Guangzhou [156100021]
  3. Project of the Science and Technology Foundation of Guangdong Province [2015A010103013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multiple cropping, a common practice of intensive agriculture that grows crops multiple times in the agricultural land in one growing season, is an effective way to fulfill the food demand given limited cropland areas. Deriving cropping cycles from satellite data provides the spatial distribution of cropping intensities that allows for monitoring of the multiple cropping activities over large areas. Although efforts have been made to map cropping cycles at 500 m or coarser resolution, producing cropping cycle maps at high resolution remain challenging because data from single satellite sensor do not provide sufficient spatiotemporal observations. In this paper, we generate dense time series of satellite data at 30 m resolution by fusion of Landsat and MODIS data, and derive the cropping cycles from the fused time series data. The method achieves overall accuracies of 92.5% and 89.2%, respectively, for two typical regions of multiple cropping in China using samples identified based on satellite time series data, and an overall accuracy of 81.2% for four subregions using all samples identified based on multi-temporal high resolution images. The mapped crop cycles show to be reasonable geographically and agree with the national census data. The fusion approach provides a feasible way to map cropping cycles at 30 m resolution and enables improved depiction of the spatial distribution of multiple cropping.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available