4.7 Article

Monitoring fouling behavior of reverse osmosis membranes using electrical impedance spectroscopy: A field trial study

Journal

DESALINATION
Volume 407, Issue -, Pages 75-84

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2016.12.012

Keywords

Electrical impedance spectroscopy fouling monitor; Fouling; Real time monitoring; Reverse osmosis; Canary cell; Field trial

Funding

  1. Singapore National Research Foundation under its Environment and Water Research Programme
  2. PUB [0901-IRIS-03-06]
  3. National Research Foundation (NRF) Environment and Water Technologies (EWT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An electrical impedance spectroscopy fouling monitor (EISFM) was used to monitor the performance of a reverse osmosis (RO) treatment train in a NEWater plant in Singapore. A 'canary cell' equipped with an EIS measurement system was installed in a side stream of the train. It was operated at the same hydrodynamics as the train to simulate the fouling conditions in the spiral wound modules. The correlation between the EISFM response and plant performance was investigated. When trending the real part of the impedance Of the low frequency signal element (Z(real_DP)) over time, there was a maximum in the normalised Z(real-DP) observed well before chemical cleaning which was indicated by the traditional operational criteria. The occurrence of Z(real-DP) peaks can be used as an indicator to initiate mitigation measures, such as adjustment of flux or crossflow velocity. As such, the frequency of chemical CIPs could be reduced. Furthermore, by obsenting the trend of Z(real-DP) over time, it was possible to identify the nature of the fouling such as the build-up of a layer of inorganic colloids. This was validated by membrane autopsy studies. This study confirms that the EISFM is suitable for monitoring the performance of RO in a real plant. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available