4.7 Article

One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network Land-Cover Classification of Multi-Seasonal Hyperspectral Imagery in the San Francisco Bay Area, California

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs9060629

Keywords

hyperspectral imagery; 1-dimensional (1-D); Convolutional Neural Network (CNN); Support Vector Machine (SVM); Random Forests (RF); machine learning; deep learning; TensorFlow; multi-seasonal; regional land cover

Funding

  1. NASA HyspIRI Preparatory Airborne Activities and Associated Science Research [NNX12AP09G]
  2. NASA grant [NNX12AP08G]
  3. NASA [NNX12AP09G, 13258, 13257, NNX12AP08G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a 1-D Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architecture was developed, trained and utilized to classify single (summer) and three seasons (spring, summer, fall) of hyperspectral imagery over the San Francisco Bay Area, California for the year 2015. For comparison, the Random Forests (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifiers were trained and tested with the same data. In order to support space-based hyperspectral applications, all analyses were performed with simulated Hyperspectral Infrared Imager (HyspIRI) imagery. Three-season data improved classifier overall accuracy by 2.0% (SVM), 1.9% (CNN) to 3.5% (RF) over single-season data. The three-season CNN provided an overall classification accuracy of 89.9%, which was comparable to overall accuracy of 89.5% for SVM. Both three-season CNN and SVM outperformed RF by over 7% overall accuracy. Analysis and visualization of the inner products for the CNN provided insight to distinctive features within the spectral-temporal domain. A method for CNN kernel tuning was presented to assess the importance of learned features. We concluded that CNN is a promising candidate for hyperspectral remote sensing applications because of the high classification accuracy and interpretability of its inner products.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available