4.7 Article

Nanoporous ceramic supported ionic liquid membranes for CO2 and SO2 removal from flue gas

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 313, Issue -, Pages 777-790

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.11.005

Keywords

Composite ceramic membranes; Ionic liquids; Gas transport; CO2/N-2 separation; SO2/CO2 separation

Funding

  1. Greek General Secretariat for Research & Technology Greece-China Transnational RT Cooperation [12CHN290]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work supported ionic liquid membranes (SILMs) were developed via physical imbibition of 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium-based ionic liquids incorporating either the tricyanomethanide ([TCM](-)) or the trifluoromethanesulfonate ([TfO](-)) anion, into tubular composite ceramic substrates bearing a mesoporous separation layer. The developed SILMs were evaluated with respect to their efficiency for removal of CO2 and SO2 gases from mixtures simulating dry flue gas. In this context, the effect of temperature, feed composition and trans-membrane pressure gradient on CO2/N-2 and SO2/CO2 separation performance was studied. For all SILMs, the highest CO2/N-2 selectivity values (up to 47.6) were exhibited at ambient temperature unlike to CO2 permeance that was favored by elevation of temperature. The SO2 permeances varied over the range of 3-9.6.10(-8) mol m(2) s(-1) Pa-1 being much higher than those determined for CO2 at comparable conditions whereas the permeances of the two gases exhibited opposite temperature dependence. The SO2/CO2 selectivity reached up to 30.7 even though it was markedly reduced with rising temperature and applied pressure gradient, in qualitative accordance to the behavior of CO2/N-2 selectivity. Besides physical interaction, the embedded ionic liquid incorporating [TfO](-) anions showed also weak chemical interaction with absorbed SO2, the contribution of the which resulted in enhanced SO2 permeation rates as compared to the ones through the embedded tricyanomethanide-based ionic liquids. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available