Journal
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS
Volume 63, Issue 2-3, Pages 428-453Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2016.09.005
Keywords
Tax avoidance; Geographic proximity; IRS audit probability; Budget constraints
Categories
Funding
- Red McCombs School of Business
- Mays School of Business
Ask authors/readers for more resources
We investigate whether geographic proximity between corporate headquarters and IRS regional offices affects corporate tax avoidance and the likelihood and productivity of IRS examinations. Using geographic distance to represent information asymmetry, we find that corporations avoid more tax when located closer to the IRS unless they are close to an IRS industry specialist This finding is consistent with taxpayers believing proximity provides them with an information advantage over the IRS. From the perspective of the IRS, we find that the Service is more likely to audit nearby companies and to assess more tax per hour from nearby taxpayers, except during constrained budget years. IRS audit likelihood and productivity are unaffected by the presence of nearby industry specialists, consistent with industry specialist proximity already constraining avoidance. Our tax compliance setting provides dual-party evidence on the proximity-information asymmetry hypothesis. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available