4.7 Article

Improved Processability and the Processing-Structure-Properties Relationship of Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene via Supercritical Nitrogen and Carbon Dioxide in Injection Molding

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym10010036

Keywords

ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE); microcellular injection molding; supercritical fluid; supercritical N-2; supercritical CO2

Funding

  1. Wisconsin Institute for Discovery (WID)
  2. Kuo K. and Cindy F. Wang Professorship
  3. College of Engineering
  4. Office of Vice Chancellor for Research and Graduate Education at the University of Wisconsin-Madison

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The processability of injection molding ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) was improved by introducing supercritical nitrogen (scN(2)) or supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO(2)) into the polymer melt, which decreased its viscosity and injection pressure while reducing the risk of degradation. When using the special full-shot option of microcellular injection molding (MIM), it was found that the required injection pressure decreased by up to 30% and 35% when scCO(2) and scN(2) were used, respectively. The mechanical properties in terms of tensile strength, Young's modulus, and elongation-at-break of the supercritical fluid (SCF)-loaded samples were examined. The thermal and rheological properties of regular and SCF-loaded samples were analyzed using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and parallel-plate rheometry, respectively. The results showed that the temperature dependence of UHMWPE was very low, suggesting that increasing the processing temperature is not a viable method for reducing injection pressure or improving processability. Moreover, the use of scN(2) and scCO(2) with UHMWPE and MIM retained the high molecular weight, and thus the mechanical properties, of the polymer, while regular injection molding led to signs of degradation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available