4.6 Article

Evasion of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps by Respiratory Pathogens

Journal

Publisher

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2016-0193PS

Keywords

neutrophil extracellular traps; immune evasion; deoxyribonuclease; Streptococcus

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [MR/L002108/1] Funding Source: Medline
  2. MRC [MR/L002108/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [MR/L002108/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) is a major immunemechanism intended to capture pathogens. These histoneand protease-coated DNA structures are released by neutrophils in response to a variety of stimuli, including respiratory pathogens, and have been identified in the airways of patients with respiratory infection, cystic fibrosis, acute lung injury, primary graft dysfunction, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. NET production has been demonstrated in the lungs of mice infected with Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Aspergillus fumigatus. Since the discovery of NETs over a decade ago, evidence that NET evasion might act as an immune protection strategy among respiratory pathogens, including group A Streptococcus, Bordetella pertussis, andHaemophilus influenzae, has been growing, with themajority of these studies being published in the past 2 years. Evasion strategies fall into three main categories: inhibition of NET release by down-regulating host inflammatory responses; degradation of NETs using pathogen-derived DNases; and resistance to themicrobicidal components of NETs, which involves a variety of mechanisms, including encapsulation. Hence, the evasion of NETs appears to be a widespread strategy to allow pathogen proliferation and dissemination, and is currently a topic of intense research interest. This article outlines the evidence supporting the three main strategies of NET evasion-inhibition, degradation, and resistance-with particular reference to common respiratory pathogens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available