4.7 Article

A simulated annealing heuristic for the hybrid vehicle routing problem

Journal

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
Volume 53, Issue -, Pages 119-132

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.12.027

Keywords

Hybrid vehicle routing problem; Hybrid electric vehicle; Simulated annealing; Cauchy function; Restart strategy

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China (Taiwan) [NSC 102-2221-E-011-082-MY3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes the Hybrid Vehicle Routing Problem (HVRP), which is an extension of the Green Vehicle Routing Problem (G-VRP). We focus on vehicles that use a hybrid power source, known as the Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV) and generate a mathematical model to minimize the total cost of travel by driving PHEV. Moreover, the model considers the utilization of electric and fuel power depending on the availability of either electric charging or fuel stations. We develop simulated annealing with a restart strategy (SA_RS) to solve this problem, and it consists of two versions. The first version determines the acceptance probability of a worse solution using the Boltzmann function, denoted as SA_RSBF. The second version employs the Cauchy function to determine the acceptance probability of a worse solution, denoted as SA_RSCF. The proposed SA algorithm is first verified with benchmark data of the capacitated vehicle routing problem (CVRP), with the result showing that it performs well and confirms its efficiency in solving CVRP. Further analysis show that SA_RScF is preferable compared to SA_RSRF and that SA with a restart strategy performs better than without a restart strategy. We next utilize the SA_RScF method to solve HVRP. The numerical experiment presents that vehicle type and the number of electric charging stations have an impact on the total travel cost. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available