4.6 Review

The Rush for Land in an Urbanizing World: From Land Grabbing Toward Developing Safe, Resilient, and Sustainable Cities and Landscapes

Journal

WORLD DEVELOPMENT
Volume 92, Issue -, Pages 242-252

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.11.016

Keywords

Large-scale land investments; Global land rush; Land grabbing; New urban agenda; Urbanization; Habitat III; SDG11

Funding

  1. EU, FP7
  2. Agriculture beyond food programme - NWO-WOTRO
  3. KNAW
  4. CIFOR
  5. NWO-Cocoon
  6. NWO

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article aims to contribute to current discussions about making cities inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable (SDG 11) by linking debates that are currently taking place in separate containers: debates on the global land rush and the new urban agenda. It highlights some important processes that are overlooked in these debates and advances a new, socially inclusive urbanization agenda that addresses emerging urban land grabs. The global land rush debate has ignored not only the fact that large-scale land investments take place in a context of rapid urbanization, but also that these investments are often triggered by urban demand, whereas discussions on the new urban agenda prepared for the latest United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat III) are typically city-biased, and pay little attention to the role of increasing cross-border investment in land and the transformation of the countryside. Using cases from areas where the global land rush and urbanization are simultaneously intensifying in the global South, we identify four areas that should be prioritized in current debates, namely the impacts of land investments on intra-city dynamics, peri-urban dynamics, and the emergence of new cities and new infrastructure corridors. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available