4.6 Article

Evidence for Abnormal Hα Variability During Near-transit Observations of HD 189733 b

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 153, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa64d3

Keywords

planets and satellites: atmospheres; planets and satellites: individual (HD 189733 b); stars: activity; stars: individual (HD 189733)

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation through Astronomy and Astrophysics Research Grant [AST-1313268]
  2. NASA Exoplanet Research Program [14-XRP14 2-0090]
  3. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1313268] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Changes in levels of stellar activity can mimic absorption signatures in transmission spectra from circumplanetary material. Thus, it is critical to understand the frequency and magnitude of these changes in order to attribute any particular signal to the circumplanetary environment. We present short-cadence, high-resolution out-of-transit H alpha spectra for the hot Jupiter host HD 189733 in order to establish the frequency and magnitude of intrinsic stellar variations in the H alpha line core. We find that changes in the line core strength similar to those observed immediately pre- and post-transit in two independent data sets are uncommon. This suggests that the observed near-transit signatures are either due to absorption of circumplanetary material or they occur preferentially in time, very near planetary transits. In either case, the evidence for abnormal H alpha variability is strengthened, though the short-cadence out-of-transit data do not argue for circumplanetary absorption versus stellar activity caused by a star-planet interaction. Further out-of-transit monitoring at higher signal-to-noise would be useful to more strictly constrain the frequency of the near-transit changes in the H alpha line core.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available