4.5 Article

Balancing the risk of spontaneous ischemic and major bleeding events in acute coronary syndromes

Journal

AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 186, Issue -, Pages 91-99

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.01.010

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Astra Zeneca
  2. Biotronik
  3. BMS
  4. Daiichi Sankyo
  5. Lilly
  6. Sanofi
  7. Phillips
  8. Mircoport
  9. AstraZeneca
  10. Sanofi-Aventis
  11. Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer
  12. Boehringer Ingelheim
  13. Abbot
  14. Amgen
  15. Merck Sharp Dohme
  16. Glaxo SmithKline
  17. Bristol-Myer Squibb
  18. Merck
  19. Roche
  20. Bayer
  21. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  22. Pfizer
  23. Aspen
  24. PlaqueTec
  25. Medicines Company
  26. ThermoFisher Scientific
  27. Correvio
  28. Accumetrics
  29. Medtronic
  30. Arisaph
  31. Boehringer-Ingelheim
  32. GlaxoSmithKline
  33. Takeda
  34. Lipimedix
  35. Regeneron
  36. Kowa
  37. Alnylam
  38. Portola
  39. Bayer Vital
  40. Roche Diagnostics
  41. Merck Co
  42. Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer
  43. Amarin
  44. Daiichi-Sankyo
  45. Merck Sharpe Dohme
  46. Novartis
  47. CSL Behring
  48. Servier
  49. Janssen
  50. Eisai

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Evaluation of antithrombotic treatments for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) requires balancing ischemic and bleeding risks to assess net benefit. We sought to compare the relative effects of ischemic and bleeding events on mortality. Methods In the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial, we compared spontaneous ischemic events (myocardial infarction or stroke) with spontaneous major bleeding events (PLATO major, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] major, Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries [GUSTO] severe) with respect to risk of mortality using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models. The comparison was performed using ratio of hazard ratios for mortality increase after ischemic vs bleeding events. Results A total of 822 patients (4.4%) had >= 1 spontaneous ischemic event; 485 patients (2.6%), >= 1 spontaneous PLATO major bleed, 282 (1.5%), >= 1 spontaneous TIMI major bleed; and 207 (1.1%), >= 1 spontaneous severe GUSTO bleed. In patients who had both events, bleeding occurred first in most patients. Regardless of classification, major bleeding events were associated with increased short- and long-term mortality that were not significantly different from the increase associated with spontaneous ischemic events: ratio of hazard ratios (95% Cls) for short- and long-term mortality after spontaneous ischemic vs bleeding events: 1.46 (0.98-2.19) and 0.92 (0.52-1.62) (PLATO major); 1.26 (0.80-1.96) and 1.19 (0.58-2.24) (TIMI major), 0.72 (0.47-1.10) and 0.83 (0.38-1.79) (GUSTO severe) (all P > 0.05) Conclusions In patients with ACS on dual antiplatelet therapy, spontaneous major bleeding events seem prognostically equivalent to spontaneous ischemic complications. This result allows quantitative comparisons between both actual and predicted bleeding and ischemic risks. Our findings help to better define net clinical benefit of antithrombotic treatments and more accurately estimate mortality after ischemic and bleeding events in patients with ACS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available