4.7 Article

Impacts of coal burning on ambient PM2.5 pollution in China

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages 4477-4491

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-17-4477-2017

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MEP's Special Funds for Research on Public Welfare [201409002]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB05020300]
  3. Global Burden of Disease - Major Air Pollution Sources (GBD-MAPS) [HEI004GBDTS]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21521064]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High concentration of fine particles (PM2.5), the primary concern about air quality in China, is believed to closely relate to China's large consumption of coal. In order to quantitatively identify the contributions of coal combustion in different sectors to ambient PM2.5, we developed an emission inventory for the year 2013 using up-to-date information on energy consumption and emission controls, and we conducted standard and sensitivity simulations using the chemical transport model GEOS-Chem. According to the simulation, coal combustion contributes 22 mu gm(-3) (40 %) to the total PM2.5 concentration at national level (averaged in 74 major cities) and up to 37 mu gm(-3) (50 %) in the Sichuan Basin. Among major coal-burning sectors, industrial coal burning is the dominant contributor, with a national average contribution of 10 mu gm(-3) (17 %), followed by coal combustion in power plants and the domestic sector. The national average contribution due to coal combustion is estimated to be 18 mu gm(-3) (46 %) in summer and 28 mu gm(-3) (35 %) in winter. While the contribution of domestic coal burning shows an obvious reduction from winter to summer, contributions of coal combustion in power plants and the industrial sector remain at relatively constant levels throughout the year.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available