4.6 Article

Predicting the impact of Lynch syndrome-causing missense mutations from structural calculations

Journal

PLOS GENETICS
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006739

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Danish Cancer Society
  2. Danish Council for Independent Research (Natural Sciences)
  3. Lundbeck Foundation
  4. A.P. Moller Foundation for the Advancement of Medical Science
  5. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  6. Cancer Research UK
  7. Lundbeck Foundation [R126-2012-12589, R209-2015-3283] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF11OC1014446, NNF15OC0017100] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. The Danish Cancer Society [R124-A7466] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate methods to assess the pathogenicity of mutations are needed to fully leverage the possibilities of genome sequencing in diagnosis. Current data-driven and bioinformatics approaches are, however, limited by the large number of new variations found in each newly sequenced genome, and often do not provide direct mechanistic insight. Here we demonstrate, for the first time, that saturation mutagenesis, biophysical modeling and co-variation analysis, performed in silico, can predict the abundance, metabolic stability, and function of proteins inside living cells. As a model system, we selected the human mismatch repair protein, MSH2, where missense variants are known to cause the hereditary cancer predisposition disease, known as Lynch syndrome. We show that the majority of disease-causing MSH2 mutations give rise to folding defects and proteasome-dependent degradation rather than inherent loss of function, and accordingly our in silico modeling data accurately identifies disease-causing mutations and outperforms the traditionally used genetic disease predictors. Thus, in conclusion, in silico biophysical modeling should be considered for making genotype-phenotype predictions and for diagnosis of Lynch syndrome, and perhaps other hereditary diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available