Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Better designs for animal studies
Daniel Cressey
NATURE (2016)
What does research reproducibility mean?
Steven N. Goodman et al.
SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE (2016)
Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement
Malcolm R. Macleod et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2015)
The Economics of Reproducibility in Preclinical Research
Leonard P. Freedman et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2015)
Reproducibility in Science Improving the Standard for Basic and Preclinical Research
C. Glenn Begley et al.
CIRCULATION RESEARCH (2015)
Randomized Block Experimental Designs Can Increase the Power and Reproducibility of Laboratory Animal Experiments
Michael F. W. Festing
ILAR JOURNAL (2014)
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
Katherine S. Button et al.
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE (2013)
Raise standards for preclinical cancer research
C. Glenn Begley et al.
NATURE (2012)
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
Leslie K. John et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance
Sander Nieuwenhuis et al.
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE (2011)
Improving the translational hit of experimental treatments in multiple sclerosis
Hanna M. Vesterinen et al.
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL (2010)
Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research
Carol Kilkenny et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2010)
Survey of the Quality of Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Reporting of Research Using Animals
Carol Kilkenny et al.
PLOS ONE (2009)
Why most published research findings are false
JPA Ioannidis
PLOS MEDICINE (2005)
Share Paper
