4.6 Article

Integration of individual and social information for decision-making in groups of different sizes

Journal

PLOS BIOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001958

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. French National Research Agency (ANR) [ANR-14-CE13-0006-01, ANR-11-IDEX-0007]
  2. EURIAS Fellowship Programme
  3. European Commission (Marie-Sklodowska-Curie Actions-COFUND Programme-FP7) [502-686353647]
  4. Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg (Institute for Advanced Study)
  5. Universite de Lyon [LABEX ANR-11-LABEX-0042]
  6. Collaborative Research in Computational Neuroscience (CRCNS) (French National Research Agency [ANR]
  7. National Science Foundation [NSF]) [ANR-16-NEUC-0003-01]
  8. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-16-NEUC-0003] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

When making judgments in a group, individuals often revise their initial beliefs about the best judgment to make given what others believe. Despite the ubiquity of this phenomenon, we know little about how the brain updates beliefs when integrating personal judgments (individual information) with those of others (social information). Here, we investigated the neurocomputational mechanisms of how we adapt our judgments to those made by groups of different sizes, in the context of jury decisions for a criminal. By testing different theoretical models, we showed that a social Bayesian inference model captured changes in judgments better than 2 other models. Our results showed that participants updated their beliefs by appropriately weighting individual and social sources of information according to their respective credibility. When investigating 2 fundamental computations of Bayesian inference, belief updates and credibility estimates of social information, we found that the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) computed the level of belief updates, while the bilateral frontopolar cortex (FPC) was more engaged in individuals who assigned a greater credibility to the judgments of a larger group. Moreover, increased functional connectivity between these 2 brain regions reflected a greater influence of group size on the relative credibility of social information. These results provide a mechanistic understanding of the computational roles of the FPC-dACC network in steering judgment adaptation to a group's opinion. Taken together, these findings provide a computational account of how the human brain integrates individual and social information for decision-making in groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available