4.7 Article

Efficient Quantum Pseudorandomness with Nearly Time-Independent Hamiltonian Dynamics

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW X
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.021006

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CREST, JST [JPMJCR1671]
  2. JSPS KAKENHI Grant [272650]
  3. Spanish MINECO [FIS2013-40627-P, FIS2016-80681-P]
  4. FPI Grant [BES-2014-068888]
  5. Generalitat de Catalunya, CIRIT Project [2014 SGR 966]
  6. European Commission (STREP RAQUEL)
  7. European Research Council (Advanced Grant IRQUAT)
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15J02650] Funding Source: KAKEN
  9. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantum randomness is an essential key to understanding the dynamics of complex many-body systems and also a powerful tool for quantum engineering. However, exact realizations of quantum randomness take an extremely long time and are infeasible in many-body systems, leading to the notion of quantum pseudorandomness, also known as unitary designs. Here, to explore microscopic dynamics of generating quantum pseudorandomness in many-body systems, we provide new efficient constructions of unitary designs and propose a design Hamiltonian, a random Hamiltonian of which dynamics always forms a unitary design after a threshold time. The new constructions are based on the alternate applications of random potentials in the generalized position and momentum spaces, and we provide explicit quantum circuits generating quantum pseudorandomness significantly more efficient than previous ones. We then provide a design Hamiltonian in disordered systems with periodically changing spin-glass-type interactions. The design Hamiltonian generates quantum pseudorandomness in a constant time even in the system composed of a large number of spins. We also point out the close relationship between the design Hamiltonian and quantum chaos.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available