4.5 Article

Examining state health agency epidemiologists and their training needs

Journal

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 83-88

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.11.007

Keywords

Epidemiology; Workforce; Training; Education

Funding

  1. de Beaumont Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Despite increases in formal education, changing trends affecting epidemiologic practice prompted concerns over whether epidemiologists had sufficient training. Methods: This study sought to explain factors that predicted low self-reported proficiency levels among daily important work tasks of state health agencies' epidemiologists. The number of knowledge gaps, instances where epidemiologists identified a work-related task both as 'very' important in their daily work and felt they were unable to perform or performed at a beginner level, was studied, and predictor variables were assessed. A total of 681 epidemiologists responded to the 2014 Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey, a national survey of state health agency workers; epidemiologists represented 7% of all respondents. Results: Epidemiologists at state health agencies worked mostly in communicable disease (31%) or general surveillance (26%). Epidemiologists reported eight key daily work-related activities with an average of three training gaps. Factors that decreased the likelihood of epidemiologists' low proficiency in performing key activities were the presence of internal trainings (adjusted odds ratio = 0.69, 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.99) and length of time working in public health (adjusted odds ratio = 0.95, 95% confidence interval, 0.93-0.98). Conclusion: Although formal education of epidemiologists is on the rise, state health agencies' epidemiologists feel unprepared to tackle one-third of their important daily tasks. (C) 2016 de Beaumont Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available