4.0 Article

Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum in children: Results of a modified Nuss procedure

Journal

ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE PLASTIQUE ESTHETIQUE
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages 8-14

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.anplas.2016.10.001

Keywords

Pectus excavatum; Children; Nuss technique; Complications; Heart damage

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction. - Pectus excavatum (PE) is the most common deformity of the anterior thoracic Children; wall. The Nuss technique allows the thorax to be reshaped with the aid of a retrosternal metallic Nuss technique; bar. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the complication rate between the original Complications; Nuss technique and a lightly modified approach. Heart damage Material and method. - We performed a retrospective single-center observational study based on the medical files of patients operated for PE in the Pediatric Surgery Unit between July 2004 and July 2015. We divided two patient groups according to the operating technique employed: the Nuss group (NG) and the modified Nuss group (MNG) with supplementary subxiphoid incision and bilateral thoracoscopy. Results. - Twenty-seven patients were included: sixteen in the NG and eleven in the MNG. No significant differences were found between the two groups for all kinds of complications: total complication rate (50% for the NG versus 54% for the MNG, P > 0.05), early (31% vs 46%, P > 0.05), late (19% vs 9%, P > 0.05), non-serious (37% vs 36%, P > 0.05) or serious (13 vs 18%, P > 0.05). There was no life threatening complication in the MNG, contrary to the NG. In the two groups, a significant difference was found (P = 0.029) regarding the operating time: longer operating times (80 +/- 25 min) were correlated with a higher complication rate. Conclusion. - The modified Nuss technique does not cause more complications than the original technique described by Nuss and it has the advantage to minimize the risk of heart damage. (C) 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available