4.1 Article

Phenotypic and Functional Characterization of Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes from Various Age- and Sex-Specific Groups of Owl Monkeys (Aotus nancymaae)

Journal

COMPARATIVE MEDICINE
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages 67-78

Publisher

AMER ASSOC LABORATORY ANIMAL SCIENCE

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cattleman for Cancer Research
  2. Owl Monkey Breeding and Research Resource (CRA) at the Michale E Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine and Research at the MD Anderson Cancer Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Owl monkeys (Aotus nancymaae) are New World NHP that serve an important role in vaccine development and as a model for human disease conditions such as malaria. Despite the past contributions of this animal model, limited information is available about the phenotype and functional properties of peripheral blood lymphocytes in reference to sex and age. Using a panel of human antibodies and a set of standardized human immune assays, we identified and characterized various peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets, evaluated the immune functions of T cells, and analyzed cytokines relative to sex and age in healthy owl monkeys. We noted age- and sex-dependent changes in CD28(+) (an essential T cell costimulatory molecule) and CD95(+) (an apoptotic surface marker) T cells and various levels of cytokines in the plasma. In immune assays of freshly isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells, IFN gamma and perforin responses were significantly higher in female than in male monkeys and in young adults than in juvenile and geriatric groups, despite similar lymphocyte (particularly T cell) populations in these groups. Our current findings may be useful in exploring Aotus monkeys as a model system for the study of aging, susceptibility to infectious diseases; and age-associated differences in vaccine efficacy, and other challenges particular to pediatric and geriatric patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available