4.7 Review

Prostate cancer diagnostics: Clinical challenges and the ongoing need for disruptive and effective diagnostic tools

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 135-149

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.11.009

Keywords

Prostate carcinoma; Commercialised prostate cancer diagnostic tests; Biomarkers; Prostate specific antigen history; Multiplexing; Point-of-care devices

Funding

  1. European Commission FP7 Programme through the Marie Curie Initial Training Network PROSENSE [317420]
  2. Biomedical Diagnostics Institute (BDI) through the Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [10/CE/B1821]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The increased incidence and the significant health burden associated with carcinoma of the prostate have led to substantial changes in its diagnosis over the past century. Despite technological advancements, the management of prostate cancer has become progressively more complex and controversial for both early and late-stage disease. The limitations and potential harms associated with the use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a diagnostic marker have stimulated significant investigation of numerous novel biomarkers that demonstrate varying capacities to detect prostate cancer and can decrease unnecessary biopsies. However, only a few of these markers have been approved for specific clinical settings while the others have not been adequately validated for use. This review systematically and critically assesses ongoing issues and emerging challenges in the current state of prostate cancer diagnostic tools and the need for disruptive next generation tools based on analysis of combinations of these biomarkers to enhance predictive accuracy which will benefit clinical diagnostics and patient welfare. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available