4.6 Article

Flux penetration in a superconducting film partially capped with a conducting layer

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.094506

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique-FNRS
  2. ARC - Wallonia-Brussels Federation [13/18-08]
  3. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  4. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)
  5. program for scientific cooperation F.R.S.-FNRS-CNPq
  6. Flemish government
  7. Flemish Science Foundation (FWO)
  8. COST MP1201 NanoSC Action
  9. FRS-FNRS (Research Fellowship)
  10. Mandat d'Impulsion Scientifique of the F.R.S.-FNRS [MIS F.4527.13]
  11. Research Council of Antwerp University (BOF)
  12. LANEF framework [ANR-10-LABX-51-01]
  13. Nanoscience Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of a conducting layer on the magnetic flux penetration in a superconducting Nb film is studied by magneto-optical imaging. The metallic layer partially covering the superconductor provides an additional velocity-dependent damping mechanism for the flux motion that helps to protect the superconducting state when thermomagnetic instabilities develop. If the flux advances with a velocity slower than omega = 2/mu(0)sigma t, where sigma is the cap layer conductivity and t is its thickness, the flux penetration remains unaffected, whereas for incoming flux moving faster than w, the metallic layer becomes an active screening shield. When the metallic layer is replaced by a perfect conductor, it is expected that the flux braking effect will occur for all flux velocities. We investigate this effect by studying Nb samples with a thickness step. Some of the observed features, namely the deflection of the flux trajectories at the border of the thick center, as well as the favored flux penetration at the indentation, are reproduced by time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau simulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available