4.7 Article

Bromodomain protein 4 discriminates tissue-specific super-enhancers containing disease-specific susceptibility loci in prostate and breast cancer

Journal

BMC GENOMICS
Volume 18, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-017-3620-y

Keywords

BRD4; Genome-wide association studies; SNPs; Functional annotation; Chromatin; Risk loci; Prostate cancer risk; breast cancer risk; schizophrenia; super-enhancer

Funding

  1. South-East Norway Health Authorities at the Oslo University Hospital [2014040]
  2. Norwegian Centre for Molecular Medicine
  3. Research Council of Norway (RCN)
  4. University of Oslo through the Centre for Molecular Medicine (Norway)
  5. Norwegian Cancer Society
  6. EU
  7. SENHA at the Oslo University Hospital
  8. Centre for Molecular Medicine (Norway)
  9. Norwegian Centre of Research in Mental Disorders (NORMENT)
  10. RCN
  11. SENHA
  12. Norwegian Health Association
  13. KG Jebsen Foundation
  14. Kristian Gerhard Jebsen Foundation
  15. Centre for Molecular Medicine Norway
  16. Research Council of Norway [213837, 223273]
  17. South-East Norway Health Authorities [2013-123]
  18. National Institutes of Health [R01AG031224, R01EB000790, RC2DA29475]
  19. Cancer Research UK [C5047/A3354]
  20. Prostate Cancer Research Foundation
  21. National Cancer Research Network UK
  22. National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) UK
  23. Health Technology Assessment Programme [96/20/06, 96/20/99]
  24. Department of Health, UK, Cancer Research UK [C522/A8649]
  25. Medical Research Council (UK) [G0500966, 75466]
  26. NCRI, UK
  27. Southwest National Health Service Research and Developmen
  28. Institute of Cancer Research
  29. Everyman Campaign
  30. Prostate Cancer UK
  31. South East Norway Health Authority (SENHA)
  32. Oslo University Hospitals
  33. South-East Norway Health Authorities at the Oslo University Hospital [2014040]
  34. Norwegian Centre for Molecular Medicine
  35. Research Council of Norway (RCN)
  36. University of Oslo through the Centre for Molecular Medicine (Norway)
  37. Norwegian Cancer Society
  38. EU
  39. SENHA at the Oslo University Hospital
  40. Centre for Molecular Medicine (Norway)
  41. Norwegian Centre of Research in Mental Disorders (NORMENT)
  42. RCN
  43. SENHA
  44. Norwegian Health Association
  45. KG Jebsen Foundation
  46. Kristian Gerhard Jebsen Foundation
  47. Centre for Molecular Medicine Norway
  48. Research Council of Norway [213837, 223273]
  49. South-East Norway Health Authorities [2013-123]
  50. National Institutes of Health [R01AG031224, R01EB000790, RC2DA29475]
  51. Cancer Research UK [C5047/A3354]
  52. Prostate Cancer Research Foundation
  53. National Cancer Research Network UK
  54. National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) UK
  55. Health Technology Assessment Programme [96/20/06, 96/20/99]
  56. Department of Health, UK, Cancer Research UK [C522/A8649]
  57. Medical Research Council (UK) [G0500966, 75466]
  58. NCRI, UK
  59. Southwest National Health Service Research and Developmen
  60. Institute of Cancer Research
  61. Everyman Campaign
  62. Prostate Cancer UK
  63. South East Norway Health Authority (SENHA)
  64. Oslo University Hospitals
  65. MRC [MR/N003284/1, G0500966] Funding Source: UKRI
  66. Cancer Research UK [14136, 16561, 19170, 16565] Funding Source: researchfish
  67. Cancer Research UK
  68. The Francis Crick Institute [10124] Funding Source: researchfish
  69. Medical Research Council [MR/N003284/1, G0500966, G0401527, G1000143] Funding Source: researchfish
  70. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0512-10114] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Epigenetic information can be used to identify clinically relevant genomic variants single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of functional importance in cancer development. Super-enhancers are cell-specific DNA elements, acting to determine tissue or cell identity and driving tumor progression. Although previous approaches have been tried to explain risk associated with SNPs in regulatory DNA elements, so far epigenetic readers such as bromodomain containing protein 4 (BRD4) and super-enhancers have not been used to annotate SNPs. In prostate cancer (PC), androgen receptor (AR) binding sites to chromatin have been used to inform functional annotations of SNPs. Results: Here we establish criteria for enhancer mapping which are applicable to other diseases and traits to achieve the optimal tissue-specific enrichment of PC risk SNPs. We used stratified Q-Q plots and Fisher test to assess the differential enrichment of SNPs mapping to specific categories of enhancers. We find that BRD4 is the key discriminant of tissue-specific enhancers, showing that it is more powerful than AR binding information to capture PC specific risk loci, and can be used with similar effect in breast cancer (BC) and applied to other diseases such as schizophrenia. Conclusions: This is the first study to evaluate the enrichment of epigenetic readers in genome-wide associations studies for SNPs within enhancers, and provides a powerful tool for enriching and prioritizing PC and BC genetic risk loci. Our study represents a proof of principle applicable to other diseases and traits that can be used to redefine molecular mechanisms of human phenotypic variation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available