4.6 Article

Modelling and predicting transport and concentration distribution of sludge in a high performance anaerobic bioreactor

Journal

BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 120, Issue -, Pages 17-24

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2016.12.023

Keywords

High performance; Spiral symmetry stream anaerobic; bioreactor; Sludge transport; Sludge concentration distribution; Mathematical model; Prediction

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51208087]
  2. Sichuan Provincial Key Lab of Process Equipment and Control Opening Program [GK201402]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The transport and concentration distribution of sludge in a high performance anaerobic bioreactor, termed spiral symmetry stream anaerobic bioreactor (SSSAB), was directly related to its effective retention of the biomass, as well as its stable operation under high loading rate. Therefore, the transport and concentration distribution of sludge in a lab-scale SSSAB were modelled and investigated in comparison with a same-sized upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor (UASBR), and two larger scale SSSABs were used for validating and expanding the application field of the model. The results showed that the model established can effectively describe the sludge transport and concentration distribution in the SSSAB. The SSSAB performed relatively low sludge transport factor compared with the UASBR, proving the favorable sludge retention ability of the SSSAB. The sludge transport factor remained constant with the scale-up of the SSSAB. The model could predict the sludge concentration distribution of a 130 L SSSAB treating traditional Chinese pharmaceutical wastewater. Also, the model can be applied to the SSSAB treating other types of wastewater with biogas production fractions in zone 1 and 2 (f(1) and f(2)) at the ranges of 0.19-0.41 and 0.18-0.41, respectively. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available