4.8 Article

Mass transfer and energy consumption for CO2 absorption by ammonia solution in bubble column

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 190, Issue -, Pages 1068-1080

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.027

Keywords

Carbon dioxide capture; Ammonia escape; Mass transfer; Energy consumption; Bubble column

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51476055]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2015CB251503]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The CO2 absorption in the bubble column using ammonia solution has been proved a viable approach for the post-combustion CO2 capture, so it is of benefit to the energy saving of CO2 absorption and the bubble column design to clarify the impacts of the geometry and running parameters on the mass transfer and energy consumption of CO2 capture. Based on the representative elementary volume method, a computational model of both the CO2 capture and ammonia slip was developed and validated by the experimental data, by which the hydrodynamic characteristics, mass transfer performances and energy consumption in CO2 capture process were investigated. The results show that at the same inlet velocity of CO2, the higher height-to-diameter ratio of the column can improve the mass transfer performances of both the CO2 capture and ammonia escape. What's more, the energy consumption decreases with the reduced orifice number on the bottom of column, and increases as the orifice size increases. An optimal height-to-diameter ratio of 5.76 is recommended when taking both the energy consumption and CO2 removal efficiency into consideration. This work can provide the viable guidance and suggestions of the better mass transfer performance and energy saving for the industrial application of CO2 capture, as well as the inhibition of ammonia escape. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available