4.7 Article

Scaling of slip avalanches in sheared amorphous materials based on large-scale atomistic simulations

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
Volume 95, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.95.032902

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [CMMI-1462749, IIP-1362146, CBET-1336634]
  2. Taub cluster and Blue Waters resources of NCSA at University of Illinois
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh [1362146] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  6. Directorate For Engineering [1336634] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Atomistic simulations of binary amorphous systems with over 4 million atoms are performed. Systems of two interatomic potentials of the Lennard-Jones type, LJ12-6 and LJ9-6, are simulated. The athermal quasistatic shearing protocol is adopted, where the shear strain is applied in a stepwise fashion with each step followed by energy minimization. For each avalanche event, the shear stress drop (Delta sigma), the hydrostatic pressure drop (Delta sigma(h)), and the potential energy drop (Delta E) are computed. It is found that, with the avalanche size increasing, the three become proportional to each other asymptotically. The probability distributions of avalanche sizes are obtained and values of scaling exponents fitted. In particular, the distributions follow a power law, P(Delta U) similar to Delta U-tau, where Delta U is a measure of avalanche sizes defined based on shear stress drops. The exponent tau is 1.25 +/- 0.1 for the LJ12-6 systems, and 1.15 +/- 0.1 for the LJ9-6 systems. The value of t for the LJ12-6 systems is consistent with that from an earlier atomistic simulation study by Robbins et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 105703 (2012)], but the fitted values of other scaling exponents differ, which may be because the shearing protocol used here differs from that in their study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available