4.5 Article

Three dimensionality in the wake of the flow around a circular cylinder at Reynolds number 5000

Journal

COMPUTERS & FLUIDS
Volume 147, Issue -, Pages 102-118

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.02.004

Keywords

Direct numerical simulation; Coherent structures; Vortex shedding; Shear layer; Wake three-dimensionality; Vortex dislocations

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Secretaria de Estado de Investigacion, Desarrollo e Innovacion, Spain [ENE2014-60577-R]
  2. Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya
  3. Termo Fluids S.L.
  4. AGAUR (Generalitat de Catalunya)
  5. Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacion - Colciencias via their doctoral training program Francisco Jose de Caldas

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The turbulent flow around a circular cylinder has been investigated at Re = 5000 using direct numerical simulations. Low frequency behavior, vortex undulation, vortex splitting, vortex dislocations and three dimensional flow within the wake were found to happen at this flow regime. In order to successfully capture the wake three dimensionality, different span-wise lengths were considered. It was found that a length Lz = 2 pi D was enough to capture this behavior, correctly predicting different aspects of the flow such as drag coefficient, Strouhal number and pressure and velocity distributions when compared to experimental values. Two instability mechanisms were found to coexist in the present case study: a global type instability originating in the shear layer, which shows a characteristic frequency, and a convective type instability that seems to be constantly present in the near wake. Characteristics of both types of instabilities are identified and discussed in detail. As suggested by Norberg, a resonance-type effect takes place in the vortex formation region, as the coexistence of both instability mechanisms result in distorted vortex tubes. However, vortex coherence is never lost within the wake. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available