4.8 Article

Fluorescent Nanomaterials for the Development of Latent Fingerprints in Forensic Sciences

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 27, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201606243

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [21205139, 51673168]
  2. Application and Innovation Project of Chinese Ministry of Public Security [2012YYCXXJXY127]
  3. Program for Liaoning Excellent Talents in University [LJQ2014130]
  4. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation [LZ16E030001]
  5. State of Sericulture Industry Technology System [CARS-22-ZJ0402]
  6. National High Technology Research and Development Program 863 [2013AA102507]
  7. National Institutes of Health [CA200504, CA195607, EB015190]
  8. Department of Defense Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program [W81XWH-12-1-0384]
  9. Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology [HR14-160]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review presents an overview on the application of latent fingerprint development techniques in forensic sciences. At present, traditional developing methods such as powder dusting, cyanoacrylate fuming, chemical method, and small particle reagent method, have all been gradually compromised given their emerging drawbacks such as low contrast, sensitivity, and selectivity, as well as high toxicity. Recently, much attention has been paid to the use of fluorescent nanomaterials including quantum dots (QDs) and rare earth upconversion fluorescent nanomaterials (UCNMs) due to their unique optical and chemical properties. Thus, this review lays emphasis on latent fingerprint development based on QDs and UCNMs. Compared to latent fingerprint development by traditional methods, the new methods using fluorescent nanomaterials can achieve high contrast, sensitivity, and selectivity while showing reduced toxicity. Overall, this review provides a systematic overview on such methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available