4.8 Article

Materials Genome in Action: Identifying the Performance Limits of Physical Hydrogen Storage

Journal

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
Volume 29, Issue 7, Pages 2844-2854

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b04933

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CSIRO Computational & Simulations Sciences
  2. Julius Award
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Fuel Cell Technologies Office [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  4. Center for Gas Separations Relevant to Clean Energy Technologies, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. DOE, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001015]
  5. European Research Council under the European Union/ERC Grant [666983]
  6. NSF
  7. Korean-Swiss Science and Technology Programme (KSSTP) of the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [162130]
  8. International Research & Development Program of National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2015K1A3A1A14003244]
  9. National Research Foundation of Korea [2015K1A3A1A14003244] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  10. European Research Council (ERC) [666983] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Materials Genome is in action: the molecular codes for millions of materials have been sequenced, predictive models have been developed, and now the challenge of hydrogen storage is targeted. Renewably generated hydrogen is an attractive transportation fuel with zero carbon emissions, but its storage remains a significant challenge. Nano porous adsorbents have shown promising physical adsorption of hydrogen approaching targeted capacities, but the scope of studies has remained limited. Here the Nanoporous Materials Genome, containing over 850 000 materials, is analyzed with a variety of computational tools to explore the limits of hydrogen storage. Optimal features that maximize net capacity at room temperature indude pore sizes of around 6 angstrom and void fractions of 0.1, while at cryogenic temperatures pore sizes of 10 A and void fractions of 0.5 are optimal. Our top candidates are found to be commercially attractive as cryo-adsorbents, with promising storage capacities at 77 K and 100 bar with 30% enhancement to 40 g/L, a promising alternative to liquefaction at 20 K and compression at 700 bar.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available