4.7 Article

Regulation of ITGA3 by the dual-stranded microRNA-199 family as a potential prognostic marker in bladder cancer

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 116, Issue 8, Pages 1077-1087

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.43

Keywords

microRNA; miR-199; ITGA3; bladder cancer; tumour suppressor

Categories

Funding

  1. KAKENHI [26293354, 10642613]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17H04332, 26293354] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Based on the microRNA (miRNA) signature of bladder cancer (BC) by deep sequencing, we recently found that several double-stranded mature miRNAs derived from the same pre-miRNAs were sufficiently expressed and acted as tumour suppressors by regulating common target genes in BC. Our deep-sequencing signature of BC showed that all miR-199 family members (miR-199a-3p/-5p and miR-199b-3p/-5p) were also downregulated. We hypothesised that these miRNAs may function as tumour suppressors by regulating common target genes. Methods: Functional assays of BC cells were performed using transfection of mature miRNA. In silico analyses and luciferase reporter analyses were applied to identify target genes of these miRNAs. The overall survival of patients with BC in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Restoration of these miRNAs significantly inhibited cell migration and invasion in BC cells. Integrin a3 (ITGA3) was directly regulated by these miRNAs. The Cancer Genome Atlas database showed that patients with low pre-miR-199 family (miR-199a-1/-2 and miR-199b) expression exhibited significantly poorer overall survival compared with patients with high pre-miR-199 family expression. Conclusions: miR-199 family miRNAs functioned as tumour suppressors in BC cells by targeting ITGA3 and might be good prognostic markers for predicting survival in patients with BC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available