4.8 Article

Fe2O3 Nanoneedles on Ultrafine Nickel Nanotube Arrays as Efficient Anode for High-Performance Asymmetric Supercapacitors

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 27, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201606728

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51572129, U1407106]
  2. International S&T Cooperation Program of China [2016YFE0111500]
  3. QingLan Project of Jiangsu Province
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [30915011204]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High performance of electrochemical energy storage devices depends on the smart structure engineering of electrodes, including the tailored nanoarchitectures of current collectors and subtle hybridization of active materials. To improve the anode supercapacitive performance of Fe2O3 for high-voltage asymmetric supercapacitors, here, a hybrid core-branch nanoarchitecture is proposed by integrating Fe2O3 nanoneedles on ultrafine Ni nanotube arrays (NiNTAs@ Fe2O3 nanoneedles). The fabrication process employs a bottomup strategy via a modified template-assisted method starting from ultrafine ZnO nanorod arrays, ensuring the formation of ultrafine Ni nanotube arrays with ultrathin tube walls. The novel developed NiNTAs@ Fe2O3 nanoneedle electrode is demonstrated to be a highly capacitive anode (418.7 F g(-1) at 10 mV s(-1)), matching well with the similarly built NiNTAs@ MnO2 nanosheet cathode. Contributed by the efficient electron collection paths and short ion diffusion paths in the uniquely designed anode and cathode, the asymmetric supercapacitors exhibit an excellent maximum energy density of 34.1 Wh kg(-1) at the power density of 3197.7 W kg(-1) in aqueous electrolyte and 32.2 Wh kg(-1) at the power density of 3199.5 W kg(-1) in quasi-solid-state gel electrolyte.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available