4.7 Article

RNF20 and histone H2B ubiquitylation exert opposing effects in Basal-Like versus luminal breast cancer

Journal

CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 694-704

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2016.126

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council [293438]
  2. Dr Miriam and Sheldon G Adelson Medical Research Foundation
  3. Israel Cancer Research Fund
  4. Jacob and Lena Joels Memorial Foundation Senior Lectureship for Excellence in the Life and Medical Sciences
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [293438] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Breast cancer subtypes display distinct biological traits that influence their clinical behavior and response to therapy. Recent studies have highlighted the importance of chromatin structure regulators in tumorigenesis. The RNF20-RNF40 E3 ubiquitin ligase complex monoubiquitylates histone H2B to generate H2Bub1, while the deubiquitinase (DUB) USP44 can remove this modification. We found that RNF20 and RNF40 expression and global H2Bub1 are relatively low, and USP44 expression is relatively high, in basal-like breast tumors compared with luminal tumors. Consistent with a tumor-suppressive role, silencing of RNF20 in basal-like breast cancer cells increased their proliferation and migration, and their tumorigenicity and metastatic capacity, partly through upregulation of inflammatory cytokines. In contrast, in luminal breast cancer cells, RNF20 silencing reduced proliferation, migration and tumorigenic and metastatic capacity, and compromised estrogen receptor transcriptional activity, indicating a tumor-promoting role. Notably, the effects of USP44 silencing on proliferation and migration in both cancer subtypes were opposite to those of RNF20 silencing. Hence, RNF20 and H2Bub1 have contrasting roles in distinct breast cancer subtypes, through differential regulation of key transcriptional programs underpinning the distinctive traits of each subtype.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available