4.6 Article

Analysis of policy scenarios for achieving renewable energy sources targets: A fuzzy TOPSIS approach

Journal

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 28, Issue 1-2, Pages 88-109

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0958305X16685474

Keywords

Renewable energy sources; energy policy; decision support; multi-criteria analysis; fuzzy TOPSIS; sensitivity analysis

Funding

  1. Intelligent Energy Europe programme [IEE/13/826/SI2.674882]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The growing need to tackle climate change and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions has led to strong interest in renewable energy sources and the setting of specific renewable energy sources targets in countries and regions within Europe. Recent political discussions have mainly revolved around the question of the most effective and efficient renewable energy sources target and how to achieve it. In this context, European and national policy makers have to address difficult issues: On the one hand, how to support the successful achievement of renewable energy targets in the short and medium term and in a time horizon up to 2030, and, on the other hand, how to share the efforts required among individual entities such as single European Member States or groups of European Member States. This paper presents a multi-criteria approach based on an extension of the Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution for group decision support in order to evaluate alternative policy scenarios for achieving the 2030 renewable energy target. Different effort-sharing arrangements among Member States are evaluated to determine the optimal burden sharing of the common renewable energy target among countries. The results and conclusions obtained can help to reduce uncertainty in the field of energy and climate policy, and aid policy makers in designing effective policies based on the findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available