4.7 Article

Doxorubicin enhances the capacity of B cells to activate T cells in urothelial urinary bladder cancer

Journal

CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 176, Issue -, Pages 63-70

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2016.12.003

Keywords

Doxorubicin; B cells; Immunology; Urinary bladder cancer; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; CD86

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Cancer Foundation [4-837/2015]
  2. Wallenberg Foundation
  3. Swedish Medical Research Council
  4. Regionala forskningsradet i Uppsala-Orebroregionen (RFR in Uppsala-Orebro) [RFR-313841]
  5. Swedish Research Council [VLL-582631]
  6. Cancer Research Foundation in Norrland, Umed, Sweden [CFF LP 15-2073]
  7. Karolinska Research Network Program in Immune Modulatory Therapies for Autoimmunity and Cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cancer is currently treated by a combination of therapies, including chemotherapy which is believed to suppress the immune system. Combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy correlates with improved survival but needs careful planning in order to achieve a synergistic effect. In this study, we have demonstrated that doxorubicin treatment of B cells resulted in increased expression of CD86 and concordantly increased CD4(+) T cell activation in the presence of superantigen, an effect that was inhibited by the addition of a CD86 blocking antibody. Furthermore, doxorubicin resulted in decreased expression of the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 and TNF-alpha. Finally, B cells from urinary bladder cancer patients, treated with a neoadjuvant regiment containing doxorubicin, displayed increased CD86-expression. We conclude that doxorubicin induces CD86 expression on B cells and hence enhances their antigen-presenting ability in vitro, a finding verified in patients. Development of tailored time and dose schedules may increase the effectiveness of combining chemotherapy and immunotherapy. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available