4.3 Article

Prioritization and Aggregation of Intuitionistic Preference Relations: A Multiplicative-Transitivity-Based Transformation from Intuitionistic Judgment Data to Priority Weights

Journal

GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 409-436

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10726-016-9503-9

Keywords

Intuitionistic preference relation (IPR); Multiplicative consistency; Intuitionistic fuzzy weight; Aggregation; Linear programming

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences Project [11YJA630202]
  2. Innovation Program of Shanghai First-class Business Management Discipline
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71572040, 71271188]
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LY15G010004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article proposes a goal programming framework for deriving intuitionistic fuzzy weights from intuitionistic preference relations (IPRs). A new multiplicative transitivity is put forward to define consistent IPRs. By analyzing the relationship between intuitionistic fuzzy weights and multiplicative consistency, a transformation formula is introduced to convert normalized intuitionistic fuzzy weights into multiplicative consistent IPRs. By minimizing the absolute deviation between the original judgment and the converted multiplicative consistent IPR, two linear goal programming models are developed to obtain intuitionistic fuzzy weights from IPRs for both individual and group decisions. In the context of multicriteria decision making with a hierarchical structure, a linear program is established to obtain a unified criterion weight vector, which is then used to aggregate local intuitionistic fuzzy weights into global priority weights for final alternative ranking. Two numerical examples are furnished to show the validity and applicability of the proposed models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available