4.5 Article

Sensitivity and Specificity of the SRQ-20 and the EPDS in Diagnosing Major Depression Ante- and Postnatally in a South African Birth Cohort Study

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11469-017-9854-8

Keywords

Perinatal; Screening; Psychometric properties; SRQ-20; EPDS; Low- and middle-income countries

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council of South Africa
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1017641]
  3. National Institute of Mental Health Brain Disorders in the Developing World: Research Across the Lifespan program [1R21MH098662-01]
  4. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1017641] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20) and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), against the major depression module of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). Data were utilised from antenatal (n = 296) and postnatal participants (n = 366) in the Drakenstein Child Health Study (DCHS), a multidisciplinary birth cohort investigating the determinants of child health. Mothers were interviewed using the SRQ-20, the EPDS and the MINI. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed in order to establish optimal cut-off scores. Current major depressive episode was diagnosed in 5% of antenatal and 4% of postnatal participants. At widely used threshold scores, the sensitivity of the tools ranged from 50 to 67%, although the positive predictive values at these scores were much lower (14-25%). Both tools perform acceptably in identifying mothers at risk for major depression perinatally. In identifying appropriate cut-off scores, optimising specificity and maintaining at least 30% sensitivity seems to be a feasible approach given the resourcing of South African mental health services.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available