4.2 Article

The Interactive Effects of Stressful Family Life Events and Cortisol Reactivity on Adolescent Externalizing and Internalizing Behaviors

Journal

CHILD PSYCHIATRY & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages 225-234

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10578-016-0635-6

Keywords

Stressful family life events; Externalizing behaviors; Internalizing behaviors; Cortisol reactivity

Funding

  1. Institutional Development Award (IDeA) Network for Biomedical Research Excellence award from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [P20GM103430]
  2. NIH/NIDA T32 Research Training Program in Substance Abuse Prevention Research (Yale University School of Medicine)
  3. NIDA (University of Washington) [A024411-07, 2R01DA023089-06, 2R01DA023089-06A1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the associations between stressful family life events and adolescent externalizing and internalizing behaviors, and the interactive effects of family life events and cortisol reactivity on problem behaviors. In a sample of 100 mothers and their adolescents (M age = 15.09; SD age = .98; 68 % girls), adolescent cortisol reactivity was measured in response to a mother-adolescent conflict interaction task designed to elicit a stress response. Mothers reported on measures of family life events and adolescent problem behaviors. Results indicated that a heightened adolescent cortisol response moderated the relations between stressful family life events and both externalizing and internalizing behaviors. Results support context-dependent theoretical models, suggesting that for adolescents with higher cortisol reactivity (compared to those with lower cortisol reactivity), higher levels of stressful family life events were associated with greater problem behaviors, whereas lower levels of stressful family life events were related to fewer problem behaviors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available