4.6 Article

How accurate are estimates of glacier ice thickness? Results from ITMIX, the Ice Thickness Models Intercomparison eXperiment

Journal

CRYOSPHERE
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 949-970

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/tc-11-949-2017

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF)
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Cryospheric Sciences Program [NNX15AD55G]
  3. European Research Council under the European Union [320816]
  4. UK Natural Environment Research Council [GR3/4663, GR3/9958, GR3/12469, NE/K004999/1]
  5. VIP_ Mont-Blanc project [ANR-14-CE03-0006-03]
  6. French National Research Agency (ANR) [ANR-12BS06-0018]
  7. NERC [NE/K004999/1, bas0100034, NE/H020667/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Natural Environment Research Council [bas0100034, NE/H020667/1, NE/K004999/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Knowledge of the ice thickness distribution of glaciers and ice caps is an important prerequisite for many glaciological and hydrological investigations. A wealth of approaches has recently been presented for inferring ice thickness from characteristics of the surface. With the Ice Thickness Models Intercomparison eXperiment (ITMIX) we performed the first coordinated assessment quantifying individual model performance. A set of 17 different models showed that individual ice thickness estimates can differ considerably - locally by a spread comparable to the observed thickness. Averaging the results of multiple models, however, significantly improved the results: on average over the 21 considered test cases, comparison against direct ice thickness measurements revealed deviations on the order of 10 +/- 24% of the mean ice thickness (1 sigma estimate). Models relying on multiple data sets - such as surface ice velocity fields, surface mass balance, or rates of ice thickness change -showed high sensitivity to input data quality. Together with the requirement of being able to handle large regions in an automated fashion, the capacity of better accounting for uncertainties in the input data will be a key for an improved next generation of ice thickness estimation approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available