4.6 Article

Rhodium Complexes Promoting C-O Bond Formation in Reactions with Oxygen: The Role of Superoxo Species

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 23, Issue 22, Pages 5232-5243

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201605959

Keywords

C-O bond formation; density functional calculations; dioxygen cleavage; rhodaoxetanes; rhodium

Funding

  1. MINECO/FEDER [CTQ2014-53033-P, CTQ2014-54071-P]
  2. Gobierno de Aragon/FSE (GA/FSE Inorganic Molecular Architecture Group) [E70]
  3. MINECO/FEDER
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [E70] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

C-O bond formation in reactions of olefins with oxygen is a long standing challenge in chemistry for which the very complicated-sometimes controversial-mechanistic panorama slows down the design of catalysts for oxygenations. In this regard, the mechanistic details of the oxidation of the complex [Rh(cod)(Ph2N3)] (1) (cod=1,5-cyclooctadiene) with oxygen to the unique 2-rhodaoxetane compound [{Rh(OC8H12)(Ph2N3)}(2)] (2) has been investigated by DFT calculations. The results of this study provide evidences for a novel bimetallic mechanism in which two rhodium atoms redistribute the four electrons involved in the cleavage of the O=O bond. Furthermore, both oxygen atoms are used to create two new C-O bonds in a controlled fashion with 100% atom economy. The key intermediates that we have found in this process are a mononuclear open-shell triplet superoxo compound, an open-shell singlet m(peroxo) derivative, and a closed-shell singlet bis(m-oxo) complex. Some of the findings are used to predict the reactions of RhI complexes with oxygen, exemplified by that of the complex [Rh(cod)(OnapyMe(2))] (3). Starting from 3, [{Rh(OC8H12)(OnapyMe(2))}(2)] (4) has been prepared and characterized, which represents the second example of a 2-rhodaoxetane compound coming from an oxygenation reaction with oxygen.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available