4.6 Article

Sensitivity, quantum limits, and quantum enhancement of noise spectroscopies

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 95, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.041803

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ERC) Project AQUMET [280169]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) Project ERIDIAN [713682]
  3. European Union QUIC [641122]
  4. Ministerio de Econom'a y Competitividad (MINECO) Severo Ochoa programme [SEV2015-0522]
  5. MAQRO [FIS2015-68039-P]
  6. XPLICA [FIS2014-62181-EXP]
  7. Agencia de Gestio d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (AGAUR) Project [2014-SGR-1295]
  8. Fundacio Privada CELLEX
  9. Marie Sklodowska-Curie fellowship project QUTEMAG [654339]
  10. ICREA Funding Source: Custom
  11. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [654339] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)
  12. European Research Council (ERC) [713682] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study the fundamental limits of noise spectroscopy using estimation theory, Faraday rotation probing of an atomic spin system, and squeezed light. We find a simple and general expression for the Fisher information, which quantifies the sensitivity to spectral parameters such as resonance frequency and linewidth. For optically detected spin noise spectroscopy, we find that shot noise imposes local standard quantum limits for any given probe power and atom number, and also global standard quantum limits when the probe power and atom number are taken as free parameters. We confirm these estimation theory results using nondestructive Faraday rotation probing of hot Rb vapor, observing the predicted optima, and finding good quantitative agreement with a first-principles calculation of the spin noise spectra. Finally, we show sensitivity beyond the atom-and photon-number-optimized global standard quantum limit using squeezed light.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available