4.2 Article

Differences in survival among adults with HIV-associated Kaposi's sarcoma during routine HIV treatment initiation in Zomba district, Malawi: a retrospective cohort analysis

Journal

INTERNATIONAL HEALTH
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages 281-287

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihx027

Keywords

AIDS-associated; Antiretroviral therapy; Kaposis sarcoma; Survival

Funding

  1. Economic and Social Research Council UK [ESRC-UK] [ES/J500094/1]
  2. Lancaster University, UK
  3. Canadian Institutes for Health Research (HIV/AIDS)
  4. United States Agency for International Development [674-A-00-OIO-0003400]
  5. Economic and Social Research Council [1403089] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The HIV epidemic is a major public health concern throughout Africa. Malawi is one of the worst affected countries in sub-Saharan Africa with a 2014 national HIV prevalence currently estimated at 10% (9.3-10.8%) by UNAIDS. Study reports, largely in the African setting comparing outcomes in HIV patients with and without Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) indicate poor prognosis and poor health outcomes amongst HIV+KS patients. Understanding the mortality risk in this patient group could help improve patient management and care. Methods: Using data for the 559 adult HIV+KS patients who started ART between 2004 and September 2011 at Zomba clinic in Malawi, we estimated relative hazard ratios for all-cause mortality by controlling for age, sex, TB status, occupation, date of starting treatment and distance to the HIV+KS clinic. Results: Patients with tuberculosis (95% CI: 1.05-4.65) and patients who started ART before 2008 (95% CI: 0.34-0.81) were at significantly greater risk of dying. A random-effects Cox model with Log-Gaussian frailties adequately described the variation in the hazard for mortality. Conclusion: The year of starting ART and TB status significantly affected survival among HIV+KS patients. A sub-population analysis of this kind can inform an efficient triage system for managing vulnerable patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available