4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Discordant frequencies of tissue-resident and circulating CD180-negative B cells in chronic rhinosinusitis

Journal

INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages 609-614

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/alr.21924

Keywords

chronic rhinosinusitis; flow cytometry; nasal polyps; B cells; CD180

Funding

  1. Garnett Passe and Rodney Williams Memorial Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The unconventional toll-like receptor (TLR) CD180 is implicated in chronic inflammatory diseases; however, its role in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) has yet to be investigated. Here we study the expression of CD180, its homologue TLR4 and myeloid differentiation factor 1 (MD1) on mucosal and systemic immune cell populations in relation to serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels. Methods: A total of 70 patients were recruited to the study. Mucosal and peripheral blood samples were prospectively collected from CRS patients and non-CRS controls without evidence of sinus disease. The expression of TLR4, MD1, and CD180 was investigated using qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), immunohistochemistry, and flow cytometry. Serum IgG levels were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results: CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) patients had significantly increased messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of CD180 and MD1 compared to controls (5.54-fold and 2.1-fold, respectively, p < 0.01). B cells lacking CD180 were lower in CRSwNP tissue compared to CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP) and controls (21.07 +/- 6.41 vs 41.61 +/- 7.82 vs 40.06 +/- 8.06; p < 0.01) but higher in blood (39.18 +/- 8.3 vs 17.95 +/- 7.82 and 12.49 +/- 4.92; p <= 0.05). Conclusion: Changes in mucosal and peripheral CD180-expressing B cells were identified in CRSwNP patients compared to CRSsNP and controls. This suggests a role for these cells in the dysregulated immune response in these patients. (C) 2017 ARS- AAOA, LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available