4.3 Article

Time to diagnosis and stage of symptomatic colorectal cancer determined by three different sources of information: A population based retrospective study

Journal

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue -, Pages 48-55

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2016.10.021

Keywords

Colorectal neoplasms/mortality; Colorectal neoplasms/pathology; Colorectal neoplasms/therapy; Delayed diagnosis; Middle aged; Neoplasm staging; Retrospective studies

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Carlos III Institute [PI052273, PI050787, PI050700, PI052692, PI052141]
  2. Health Promotion and Preventive Activities-Primary Health Care Network
  3. Ministry of Health ISCIII-RETCI [G03/170, RD06/0018, RD12/0005/0011]
  4. European Union ERDF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Survival rates from colorectal cancer (CRC) are highly variable in Europe. This variability could potentially be explained by differences in healthcare system delays in diagnosis. However, even when such delays are reduced, the relationship of the diagnostic interval ( time from presentation with symptoms to diagnosis) with outcome is uncertain. Methods: A total of 795 patients with CRC from 5 regions of Spain were retrospectively examined in this population-based multicenter study. Consecutive incident cases of CRC were identified from pathology services. The total diagnostic interval (TDI) was defined as the time from the first presentation with symptoms to diagnosis based on 3 different sources of information: (i) patient-recorded data (PR-TDI) by interview, (ii) hospital-recorded data (HR-TDI), and (iii) general practitioner-recorded data (GPR-TDI). Concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) were used to estimate the agreement of 3 different TDIs. The TDIs of patients with different stages of CRC were also compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: The median TDI was 131 days based on patient interview data, 91 days based on HR data, and 111 days based on GPR data. Overall, the agreement of these TDIs was poor (CCCPRvsHR = 0.399, CCCPRvsGPR = 0.518, CCCHRvsGPR = 0.383). Univariate analysis indicated that the TDI was greater in those with less advanced CRC for all 3 methods of calculation, but this association was only statistically significant for the HR-TDI (p = 0.021). Conclusion: There is no evidence that patients with more advanced CRC have longer TDIs. In fact, we found an inverse relationship between the TDI and CRC stage, an example of the waiting time paradox. This association may likely be due to the presence of unmeasured confounders as the stage when symptoms appear or the tumour aggressiveness. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available